POLICY & REGULATION · 8 min read
Sri Lanka Is Not Underusing GSP+. Apparel Is, and the Clock That Ends the Scheme Started on 1 July
The EU’s own figures put Sri Lanka’s preference utilization at a record 69 percent for 2024, not the 49-to-59 percent band that is being publicly argued for the 2027 reapplication. The shortfall sits in one product section. On 1 July, the World Bank moved Sri Lanka into the income group the scheme is not written for, by roughly $34.
By the ESGNexus Editorial Team · September 2026 · Estimated reading time: 8 minutes
KEY TAKEAWAYS
|
Sri Lanka has to reapply for GSP+ in 2027. Current preferences run to the end of 2028, and nothing renews automatically. That much is settled, and the apparel industry has said so publicly.
What is not settled is the number the argument is being built on. The Joint Apparel Association Forum, writing under its own name in the Daily FT on 28 July, told the country that Sri Lanka’s GSP+ utilization rate “has hovered between just 49% and 59% in recent years” and that “nearly half the available advantage goes unused”. The EU’s own published series for the same measure says something materially different, and the difference changes what the country should be asking Brussels for.
Two Numbers Are in Circulation. Only One of Them Is Defined
The EU GSP Hub, the Commission-financed information portal for the scheme, publishes the preference utilization rate, with its definition: “the ratio of preferential imports to GSP+ eligible imports”. On that measure, Sri Lanka reached 69 percent in 2024, described on the page as a record, having fallen to 59 percent in 2023 from 68 percent in 2022. The page was last updated on 18 July 2026.
The 49-to-59 percent band has no definition, source, or date range beyond “recent years”. It is consistent with what the GSP Hub itself reported before 2020: an average of 59 percent of eligible imports over the 2011-to-2019 period, and 60 percent utilization against 84 percent eligibility in 2018. Those figures underpinned a well-documented national debate five years ago, in which the causes identified were the cost of certification for smaller exporters, the documentation burden, and policy volatility, not rules of origin.
This is not a claim that the industry body is wrong. It is a claim that one of these numbers can be checked while the other cannot, and that the checkable one has moved by 10 points in a single year. A reapplication based on an undefined figure invites the Commission to correct it, and the correction is not rhetorically in Sri Lanka’s favor: it removes the “half of it goes unused” framing and replaces it with a narrower, harder question about one sector.
The Shortfall Sits in One Product Section
Sri Lanka’s aggregate rate is held down by the size of the apparel sector, not by a general failure to claim preference. Apparel accounted for 49 percent of everything that entered the EU under the SP+ preference in 2024 and used only 57 percent of the preference available to it. Rubber, the second-largest section at 19 percent of preferential imports, ran above 90 percent. So did fish and food preparations.
| Product section | Preference utilization, 2024 | What the number means for that sector |
| National, all sections | 69 percent (record; 59 percent in 2023, 68 percent in 2022) | The headline figure. 83 percent of exports to the EU were eligible for GSP+ reductions, and 58 percent of total exports actually used them. |
| Apparel | 57 percent | Largest export section to the EU and 49 percent of all preferential imports. This is the single component pulling the national rate down. |
| Rubber | Above 90 percent | 19 percent of preferential imports. Second-largest section and already close to full use; there is little left to capture here. |
| Fish | Above 90 percent | More dependent on the preference than apparel, and with less cushion if it goes. |
| Food preparations | Above 90 percent | Same position as fish. Small in value, large in exposure. |
| Machinery | Below 50 percent | The one section using less of its preference than apparel. Nobody is lobbying about it. |
Source: EU GSP Hub, country information for Sri Lanka, last updated 18 July 2026, gsphub.eu. The portal defines utilization as preferential imports divided by GSP+ eligible imports. The portal publishes bands rather than point estimates for sections above 90 percent and below 50 percent, and reproduces those bands here unchanged.
Read the exposure rather than the headline, and the ranking inverts. Rubber, fish, and food preparations are the sectors most dependent on GSP+ per rupee of export, as they already use nearly all of it. Apparel has the largest absolute exposure and the largest unused cushion. Those are different problems, and they do not have the same fix.
What Annex 22-03 Actually Requires
The industry’s stated diagnosis is that EU rules of origin “require garments to be made from the yarn stage domestically, a threshold the local fabric base can’t meet”. The commercial effect described is real: imported fabric does not confer origin, but the legal test is narrower than the phrasing suggests, and the difference is an investment decision.
Annex 22-03 to the Union Customs Code delegated regulation sets the qualifying operation for Chapter 61, knitted or crocheted apparel, as “Knitting and making-up (including cutting)” for beneficiary countries other than least developed countries. For Chapter 62, woven apparel, it is “Weaving accompanied by making-up (including cutting)”. For least developed countries, both chapters read “Manufacture from fabric”.
The test is therefore fabric formation, not spinning. A Sri Lankan manufacturer does not need a domestic yarn industry to qualify; it needs the knitting or weaving step to happen in Sri Lanka or in a cumulation partner. That is a materially cheaper proposition than the yarn-stage framing implies, and it points capital at looms and knitting machines rather than at spinning mills.
It also precisely names the structural disadvantage. Bangladesh, as a least developed country, may import fabric and still qualify for one transformation, while Sri Lanka has two. Bangladesh graduates from least-developed status in 2026 but keeps its Everything But Arms preferences, on the Commission’s own statement, at least until the end of 2029.
The Second Clock, and It Started on 1 July
On 1 July 2026, the World Bank reclassified Sri Lanka from lower-middle-income to upper-middle-income, alongside Jordan, Micronesia, the Philippines and Viet Nam. The classification runs to 30 June 2027 and rests on Atlas GNI per capita for 2025 of $4,670, against an upper-middle-income threshold of $4,636.
| The reclassification is a marker of resilience, though the country only narrowly crossed the threshold. World Bank Development Data Group, 1 July 2026 |
The arithmetic behind the crossing is worth stating plainly. Sri Lanka’s Atlas GNI per capita was $3,870 for 2024 and $4,670 for 2025—a 20.7 percent rise in dollar terms in a year in which the World Bank records real GDP growth of 5 percent. The remainder is prices, population, net primary income and the exchange rate at which rupees are converted, none of which is output. The Bank also rounds both sides of the comparison: thresholds are rounded to end in five, and GNI per capita estimates to end in zero. The margin is one rounding step wide.
Sri Lanka has stood on this line before, and closer to the middle of it.
| Date | What happened |
| 1 July 2019 | The World Bank classified Sri Lanka as upper-middle income for the first time, based on the 2018 Atlas GNI per capita of $4,060, with a threshold band beginning at $3,996, $64 above the line. |
| 1 July 2020 | Sri Lanka appears among the ten economies changing category in the Bank’s next update, in a group it describes as having been “very close to the respective thresholds last year”. The classification did not hold. |
| 8 July 2025 | For the 2026 fiscal year, Sri Lanka remains lower-middle-income, with an upper-middle-income threshold of $4,466. Atlas GNI per capita for 2024 was $3,870. |
| 1 July 2026 | Upper-middle income again, at $4,670 against $4,636. Year one of three on the count that matters. |
| 1 January 2027 | Regulation (EU) 2026/1395 enters into application after ten years. Regulation 978/2012, the scheme Sri Lanka currently sits in, is in force only until 31 December 2026. |
| 31 December 2028 | The two-year grace period ends. Every existing GSP+ beneficiary must have reapplied; nothing rolls over. |
Sources: World Bank Data Blog, country income classification updates of 1 July 2019, 1 July 2020 and 1 July 2026; World Bank Open Data, GNI per capita, Atlas method, series updated 13 July 2026; The Morning, 8 July 2025, for the 2026 fiscal-year thresholds; EUR-Lex record for Regulation (EU) 2026/1395; European Commission, DG TAXUD. The Bank fixes each year’s classification based on the estimate available in July and does not revise it mid-year, so the figures above are not directly comparable to today’s revised series.
Indonesia Is What the End of That Clock Looks Like
This is not a hypothetical mechanism. On 11 August, the Commission’s Access2Markets service set out the changes taking effect on 1 January 2027 and named two countries that will leave the scheme altogether. One is Kenya, which has a broader trade agreement. The other is Indonesia, removed because it “has been classified as an upper-middle-income country for three consecutive years”. From that date, in the Commission’s words, all goods from those countries lose GSP tariff preferences, “and not just selected sections”.
The architecture matters here and is easy to miss. The Commission describes Standard GSP as an arrangement for “lower-middle-income countries and below”. GSP+ is a special incentive arrangement available to Standard GSP countries that ratify and implement the conventions. Income class gates the whole scheme, not the sustainability tier on top of it. The Commission also states twice, in its own questions and answers on the new regulation, that “the new GSP does not change the country graduation process”.
One year of upper-middle-income classification does nothing. Three consecutive years is what removed Indonesia. Sri Lanka’s first year runs to 30 June 2027, and the estimate that determines the second year is the 2026 Atlas GNI per capita, which the Bank will publish in July 2027.
Both Named Remedies Are Weaker Than They Look
The industry proposes two fixes for the apparel utilization gap: domestic fabric capacity, and cumulation agreements with regional partners. The first is sound and, on the reading of Annex 22-03 above, cheaper than advertised. The second has just become harder in three separate ways, all of them in documents published this year.
- The evidentiary bar has risen. Under the new regulation, cross-regional and extended cumulation are granted only where the applicant proves all three of the following: that cumulation responds to its development, financing and trade needs; that it cannot comply with the applicable rules of origin without it; and that it does not negatively affect other countries, “especially EBA beneficiary countries”. The Commission is also directed to weigh the applicant’s dependency on the supplying country.
- The third condition points at a competitor. The Everything But Arms beneficiaries whose position the Commission must protect include Bangladesh, Sri Lanka’s direct competitor in the same EU apparel market, which is covered until at least the end of 2029.
- The regional group itself is thinning. Sri Lanka’s GSP regional cumulation group is Group III: Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, and cumulation applies between countries in the same group. India, the region’s largest fabric supplier, concluded a free trade agreement with the EU in 2026; the Commission’s own worked example states that India will retain standard GSP preferences for two more years after that agreement takes effect, and then graduate out of the scheme.
For textiles, there is a further filter. Regional cumulation requires processing that goes beyond the operations listed in Annex 22-05: fitting buttons and fastenings, making button-holes, hemming, fitting pockets, labels and badges, ironing and preparation for ready-made sale, or any combination of these. Finishing work does not create origin.
None of this makes cumulation unavailable. It makes a cumulation request a document that has to survive an assessment of its effect on Bangladesh, filed into a group whose largest fabric economy is on a timetable out of the scheme. That is a different piece of work from the one the phrase “cumulation agreements with regional partners” suggests, and it should be costed as such before it is offered as the answer.
What We Could Not Establish
The consolidated text of Regulation (EU) 2026/1395 could not be retrieved this session; EUR-Lex returned an empty document body on four separate URL forms. Everything stated here about the new regulation therefore comes from the Commission’s own published explanations of it, the DG TRADE questions and answers, the Access2Markets summary of 11 August,t and the DG TAXUD customs pages,s and no article number is quoted anywhere above.
That leaves one thing genuinely open. If Sri Lanka’s classification were to hold for three consecutive years, the date preferences would actually stop depends on the act that removes a country from the beneficiary list and when that act takes effect. The industry’s public estimate is that most-favored-nation tariffs “could apply from around mid-2029” on a late application. We cannot confirm that date from any published source, and we are not printing one of our own.
Two smaller absences are worth recording. The Commission states that the exact process for GSP+ reapplication “will be outlined in a procedural regulation after the publication of the GSP Regulation in the Official Journal”. We found no such procedural regulation published as at 4 September 2026, which means the industry is being urged to apply early in 2027 under a process that does not yet exist in law. And the EU’s own GSP Hub page for Sri Lanka, updated on 18 July 2026, still describes the country as “a lower-middle-income economy”, two and a half weeks after the World Bank moved it.
What to Do Now
1. Use the defined number in every submission. Use 69 percent for 2024, with the EU’s own definition attached and the source named, and 57 percent for apparel. A figure the Commission publishes cannot be corrected back at you across a negotiating table.
2. Cost the fabric-formation step, not the yarn step. Annex 22-03 requires knitting or weaving to be accompanied by making-up. Boards approving capital for compliance with rules of origin should be pricing looms and knitting capacity, and should ask their advisers to confirm the chapter rule for their own HS lines before signing.
3. If you are in rubber, fish or food preparations, model the downside, not the upside. You are already using more than 90 percent of your preference. No utilization gain is available to you. Your exposure is entirely to the scheme continuing, which makes the income clock your file, not apparel’s.
4. Put the classification on the risk register with a date. The World Bank publishes on 1 July each year and does not revise mid-year. Sri Lanka finds out on 1 July 2027 whether year two is on the board. That is a scheduled, checkable event, and it belongs in the same paragraph of the annual report as the reapplication itself.
5. Cost a cumulation request properly before proposing it. Three conditions to evidence: an assessment of the effect on Bangladesh, and a regional group whose largest fabric supplier is on a two-year exit clock once the EU-India agreement applies. If this is the strategy, it needs a filing plan and a lawyer, not a line in a position paper.
ESGNexus will track three things from here: whether the procedural regulation governing GSP+ reapplication is published and what filing window it sets; the World Bank’s classification release on 1 July 2027, which decides whether Sri Lanka’s second consecutive year lands; and whether the Department of Commerce publishes anything at all about the reapplication, which as of our last check still described the 2014-to-2023 scheme. Our earlier analysis of the reapplication and the Paris Agreement condition covers the compliance side of the same file.
Sources & Further Reading
EU GSP Hub, “Monitoring Missions and Priorities in Sri Lanka”, last updated 18 July 2026, gsphub.eu
Joint Apparel Association Forum, “GSP+ reapplication looms: What Sri Lanka’s apparel sector must fix now”, Daily FT, 28 July 2026, ft.lk
European Commission, DG TRADE, “Questions & Answers on the new EU Generalized Scheme of Preferences”, 2026, policy.trade.ec.europa.eu
European Commission, Access2Markets, “The EU’s renewed GSP scheme: Key updates for 2027”, 11 August 2026, trade.ec.europa.eu
European Commission, DG TAXUD, “Generalized System of Preferences (GSP)” rules of origin, 2026, taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu
Annex 22-03 and Annex 22-05 to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446, Official Journal L 343, 29 December 2015, taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu
Regulation (EU) 2026/1395 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2026, published 22 June 2026, eur-lex.europa.eu
World Bank Data Blog, “Who moves up and why? A closer look at the 2026-2027 release of the World Bank Group Country Income Classifications”, 1 July 2026, blogs.worldbank.org
World Bank Data Blog, “New country classifications by income level: 2019-2020”, 1 July 2019, and “New World Bank country classifications by income level: 2020-2021”, 1 July 2020, blogs.worldbank.org
World Bank Open Data, GNI per capita, Atlas method (current US$), indicator NY.GNP.PCAP.CD, series updated 13 July 202,6 api.worldbank.org
World Bank Data Help Desk, “How does the World Bank classify countries?” and “How are the income group thresholds updated?” datahelpdesk.worldbank.org
The Morning, “World Bank’s 2026 country classifications: Sri Lanka retains lower-middle-income status”, 8 July 2025, and ” Under-utilization of GSP+ in Sri Lanka”, 7 November 2021, themorning.lk
ESGNexus, “GSP+, the Paris Agreement and Sri Lanka’s exporters”, 27 August 2026, esgnexus.lk/2026/08/27/gsp-plus-paris-agreement-sri-lanka-exporters/
| About ESGNexus ESGNexus is Sri Lanka’s independent platform for ESG, CSR, and sustainability intelligence. We track company-level ESG performance, regulatory developments, and sustainability data across Sri Lanka’s listed companies, large unlisted corporates, and state-owned enterprises. All editorial content is independently produced. Sponsored content is clearly labeled. |
Data disclaimer: Information in this article is sourced from publicly available documents. ESGNexus does not independently verify company disclosures. Errors and omissions excepted.